2025 Senior Competition · Men's Metro 2 North West - 2025
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | BYEs | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. La Trobe University Hockey Club 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 100% |
| 2. Footscray Hockey Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 100% |
| 3. Whittlesea Hockey Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 100% |
| 4. PEGS Hockey Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 100% |
| 5. Melton Hockey Club | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 100% |
| 6. Brunswick Hockey Club | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7. RMIT Hockey Club | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 0 | 0% |
| 8. Hume Hockey Club | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 0% |
| 9. Melbourne University Hockey Club | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | 0% |
| 10. La Trobe University Hockey Club 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.